I must say some players havea habit of gunning for a lynch with no evidence. As an example Aza only got 3 investigation results:
1 that showed a single visitor (of whom he did not know the identity)
1 that showed noone visited his target
1 no result
then he died.
Using a critical thought process is essential in Mafia and throwing around wild accusations with no evidence only muddies the water and makes it more difficult for town.
So as you can see Aza had absolutely NO evidence against anyone he was gunning for. Players should refrain from claiming "i knew it! see i was right all along i told you so!" after a mafia game when really they had no evidence in the first place.
WOW, that's interesting. not to offend, but imho you don't need an "investgative" power to have "evidence",
I dug and dug on Russia's posts, and was certain of his guilt, not from any inestigation result i got,
but from just paying attention and "investigating" him myself.
I wrote a wall of text, which IMO made him stand out to no end, that he was guilty as sin.
I just struggled to get this accross to people.
Also, while I was putting in a couple of hours "investigating" Russia, I could CLEARLY see that wyldcarde and Khorgor were also Mafia.
Although, to push for their lynch at that time would have been chaos, It was hard enough to get people to believe that i right about, Russia
I only mentioned their names at the bottom of my final post, as i was assured the mafia would kill me, as i was onto them.
So yeah, just because your evidence isn't backed up by an "investigation" power, it doesn't mean there is no evidence on the person.